The Tribunal granted the respondent four weeks to file a reply to the final opportunity. An interim order was continued. No substantive ruling was made on the merits or the appeal.
Granted respondent four weeks to file reply; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2758/JL/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2759/JL/2016 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1393/JL/2016
Smt. Rekha Rani … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajat Bhardwaj, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 30.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1393/JL/2016
One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. List on 21st
July, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 30th March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1393/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Rekha Rani
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
