The tribunal issued process for notice of appeal. The respondent counsel accepted notice and sought time for reply. The appeal was listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1391/JL/2016 Rajesh Anand … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Jaswant Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Akansha Chugh, Advocate For Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 23.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1391/JL/2016
An affidavit in support of appeal has been filed by the appellant. Issue notice of the appeal to the respondent. Ms Akanksha Chugh, counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 12th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member (B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
23rd February, 2017
‘s’ FPA-PMLA-1391/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Rajesh Anand
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
