Disposed

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 of Ms. Hetal Nikunj Modi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

ATFP21 Mar 2017FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal listed two appeals for hearing. The appellant's counsel stated related writ petitions were disposed of by the Gujarat High Court, while the respondent cited previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal allowed parties to file written synopses before the next date.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 of Ms. Hetal Nikunj Modi v/s The Joint… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-1482/AHD/2015 (Misc.)

¶3

¶4

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 Ms. Hetal Nikunj Modi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant	: Shri Sumit Shah, Advocate Shri Nimish Kapadia, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	: MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶7

ORDER

¶8

21.03.2017

¶9

MP-PMLA-1482/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010

¶10

The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that in view of the last order passed in Appeal no. FPA-PMLA-146 to 157/AHD/2011, the writ petitions have since been disposed off by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court (Copy of the Hon’ble High Court’s order is placed before us and the same is taken on record). List the above mentioned Appeal along with the Appeal nos. FPA-PMLA-146 to 157/AHD/2011 on 31^st July, 2017.

¶11

Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that similar Appeals have already been decided in favour of Respondent by Judgment dated 31^st March, 2011 passed in Appeal nos. FPA-PMLA15/AHD/2008, FPA-PMLA-16/AHD/2008, FPA-PMLA-25/AHD/2008 and FPA-PMLA-26/AHD/2008 and on 24^th June, 2011 in Appeal no.

¶12

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

21/AHD/2008. The learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the facts and circumstances of the present Appeal are different. It is also informed that there are subsequent events where the two orders are passed in favour of the Appellant and copies of orders would be filed at an early date. Anyhow, without expressing any opinion on merits at this stage, the objection of Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate would also be considered at the time of hearing of the Appeal.

¶15

Both the parties are allowed to file written synopsis along with the copies of the judgments which were decided earlier by this Tribunal and other judgments on which they rely on or before the next date.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶18

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶19

New Delhi, 21^st March, 2017

¶20

‘R’

¶21

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010

¶22

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 of Ms. Hetal Nikunj Modi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 of Ms. Hetal Nikunj Modi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases