Listed order without substantive decision. Court granted liberty to file synopsis and allowed written submissions for both the appellant and respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1354/KOL/2016
Siva Compulinks Pvt. Ltd. & M/s. AIWO Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Bineesh K., Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 17.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1354/KOL/2016
Learned counsel for the respondent Mr. S. A. Saud submits that the reply is not necessary and he would file copy of the prosecution complaint and he will supply the same to the learned counsel of the appellant during the course of the day. Liberty is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing. Both the parties are allowed to file the written submissions.
List on 27th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 17th August, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1354/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Siva Compulinks Pvt. Ltd. & M/s. AIWO Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
