Brief procedural order extending time for filing a reply in a stay application connected with the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. No substantive disposal by this Tribunal in this specific proceeding.
Time extended for filing reply; interim stay continued pending court's consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2594/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016 Ajay Jain … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Dharmender Bhan, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate for Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
| ORDER 02.02.2017 |
|---|
FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016
Reply has not been filed. Some more time is sought on behalf of the respondent which is not opposed by the counsel for the appellant. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder thereafter.
List on 12th May, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
2nd February, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1353/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Ajay Jain
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
