Listed only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1351/KOL/2016
Sangbad Pratidin Television Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Mayank Jain, Advocate Mr. Madhur Jain, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 17.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1351/KOL/2016
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the reply is not
necessary, he would rely upon the prosecution complaint.
List on 27th October, 2017.
In the meanwhile, the appellant is allowed to file the written synopsis. Copy of the prosecution complaint has already been handed over to the learned counsel for the appellant.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 17th August, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1351/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Sangbad Pratidin Television Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
