The Presiding Officer, Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, adjourned the matter due to the respondent's counsel being unavailable and no synopsis filed. The interim order was continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2565/DLI/2016 (Stay)
FPA-PMLA-1311/DLI/2016 Neel Krish … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, … Respondent
Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Manav Gupta, Advocate Shri Esha Dutta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv. for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 24.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1311/DLI/2016
The main arguing counsel on behalf of the respondent is not
available, even the written synopsis has not been filed.
In the interest of justice the matter is adjourned.
List on 7th July, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
FPA-PMLA-1311/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
Both the parties are allowed to file the written submission on or
before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 24th March, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1311/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
Neel Krish
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
