The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of an appeal filed against an adjudicating order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, holding the appeal abated due to the appellant's death and permitting its withdrawal accordingly.
Allowance of withdrawal of the abated appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1303/MUM/2016
Om Prakash Sonik … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Sanjay Chandra, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Shaijan C. George, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
13.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1303/MUM/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant Shri
Om Prakash Sonik has passed way and appeal has become abated. In those circumstance, he wishes to withdraw the appeal being abated
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn as the same has
been abated.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1303/MUM/2016 Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal abated by the death of the appellant can be allowed to be withdrawn.
Whether the withdrawal of an abated appeal should be permitted.
Om Prakash Sonik
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
