This order from the Pre-PMLA Tribunal grants the respondent one final opportunity to file a reply and adjourns the application. An interim stay was initially continued pending further proceedings.
Interim stay continued. One final opportunity to file reply granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3022/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1268/CHN/2016
R. Viswanathan … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri S. Hari Haran, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
27.03.2017
MP-PMLA-3022/CHN/2017 (Stay)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant. List this application alongwith the appeal on 12th July, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 27th March, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1268/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to continued interim stay pending final disposal of the appeal filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
R. Viswanathan
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
