The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal where the appellant contended that no criminal complaint under the scheduled offence or the PML Act was registered, calling for time by the respondent to verify the position.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1266/AHD/2016
Rahul Gangwal … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Arun Goyal, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER ORDER 04.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1266/AHD/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that no criminal complaint under the scheduled offence has been registered against the appellant and similarly under the PML Act. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate
counsel for the respondent seeks time to verify the position.
List on 4th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 4th July, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA/1266/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any criminal complaint under the scheduled offence has been registered against the appellant.
Rahul Gangwal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
