This order granted six weeks time to both parties to file the written synopsis and listed the matter for hearing on 22nd November, 2017. It does not contain any substantive legal proposition or decision on the merits of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1263/AHD/2016
Ritesh Bansal … Appellant Versus The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sushil Kumar Gupta, Advocate Shri Ajit Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 04.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1263/AHD/2016
Both the parties seek six weeks time to file the written synopsis. Let
the same be filed within six weeks.
List on 22nd November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 4th July, 2017 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1263/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ritesh Bansal
The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
