Appeal filed by City Limouzine (I) Ltd. against an order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant and the respondent had not filed a reply. The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2469/MUM/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-2470/MUM/2016 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1261/MUM/2016
City Limouzine (I) Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
01.03.2017
MP-PMLA-2469/MUM/2016 (COD), MP-PMLA-2470/MUM/2016 (STAY) & FPA-PMLA-1261/MUM/2016
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Even the respondent has not filed the reply. It appears from the record that advance copy was served to the Department on 11th March, 2016. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. Copy of the order be sent to the appellant as well as his counsel by Registry.
FPA-PMLA-1261/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 2
List the appeal on 10th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
01st March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1261/MUM/2016
Page 2 of 2
City Limouzine (I) Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
