Order in a preventive detention petition under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. No one appeared for the appellant; seeking re-notification for counsel to appear for withdrawal of vakalatanama.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2628/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1252/JL/2016
Sidhu Fort Marriage Place … Applicant/Appellant Sukhwinder Singh
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandher
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 31.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1252/JL/2016
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. However, the registry has received an application for withdrawal of his Vakalatanama by the counsel. We are of the view that the counsel should appear before us and make such a statement. Since the counsel is not feeling well as informed, re-notify on 31st May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member (B.K. Bansal) Member New Delhi, 31st March, 2017. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1252/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Sukhwinder Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandher
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
