Listing order in an appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act where both parties were directed to file written synopses before the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1245/DLI/2016
Yes Bank Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Director, Financial Intelligent Unit- India … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Madhav Khuran, Advocate Shri Arjun Mahajan, Advocate Shri Puneet, Advocate Shri Mridul Yadav
For the respondent : Shri Satish Agarwala, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
19.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-1245/DLI/2016
An Adjournment is sought on behalf of the respondent. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that if a short date is given his client have no objection. Under these circumstances let both the parties may file the written synopsis on or before the next date. No adjournment is likely to be granted on the next date.
FPA-PMLA-1245/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
These matters may be listed for final argument on 9th February,
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 19th January, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1245/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
Yes Bank Ltd.
The Director, Financial Intelligent Unit- India
Justice Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
