This is a procedural order granting one final opportunity to the appellant to file a reply to the amended appeal. The matter was listed but this order does not dispose of the appeal or decide any substantive legal issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3097/KOL/2016 (Misc) MP-PMLA-2438/KOL/2016 (u/s 26) MP-PMLA-2439/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1242/KOL/2016
Indian Bank … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Brijesh Kumar Tambar, Advocate with Ms. Poonam Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA SHRI B.K. BANSAL |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER : MEMBER |
| 3 | ORDER 0.03.2017 |
FPA-PMLA-1242/KOL/2016
Reply to the amended appeal has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to file the same within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder to the amended appeal on or before the next date.
List on 09th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member (B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 30th March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1242/KOL/2016 Page 1 of 1
Indian Bank
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
