The appeal was not heard due to the unavailability of the respondent's counsel and was listed for an upcoming date.
The appeal was not heard due to the unavailability of the respondent's counsel and was listed for an upcoming date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2397/MUM/2016 (Mics.) FPA-PMLA-1240/MUM/2016
Smt. Anuradha Krishna Chamankar
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Viraj Kadam, Advocate For the respondent : None. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
06.12.2017
FPA-PMLA-1240/MUM/2016
In these matters earlier counsel Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate was appearing on behalf of the respondent. We have been informed that he is not in the panel of the respondent. Mr. Pawan Kumar, Enforcement Officer seeks some time to engage another counsel in place of Mr. S.A. Saud. Mr. Pawan submits that Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate has been appointed in place of Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate. He is not available today.
List these matters on 17th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 6th December, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1240/MUM/2016 Page 1 of 1
Anuradha Krishna Chamankar
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
