Dismissed

FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016 of Rose Vally Marketing India Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

ATFP23 Mar 2017FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal was dismissed for lack of representation and non-prosecution. Counsel was allowed to withdraw because the appellant failed to pay outstanding fees to counsel and could not give instructions despite communications.

What did the court decide?

Vakalatnama withdrawn; appeal dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution.

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016 of Rose Vally Marketing India Ltd. v/s The… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3288/KOL/2017 FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016

¶3

Rose Vally Marketing India Ltd. … Applicant/Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

¶6

… Respondent

¶7

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶8

For the appellant	:	I.G. & Associates
For the respondent	:	Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	:	CHAIRMAN
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	:	MEMBER

¶9

ORDER 23.03.2017

¶10

MP-PMLA-3288/KOL/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016

¶11

Fresh application has been filed. By virtue of this application, learned Counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the Vakalatnama. It is stated in the application that despite of various communications, the appellant has failed to pay the outstanding amount and unable to give the instruction, therefore, the counsel is unable to represent the case of the appellant. Alongwith the application the notice of the E-mail dated 26^th December, 2016, 28^th December, 2016 and 06^th January, 2017 have been filed. In view of the averments made in the application, the prayer is allowed. The counsel is allowed to withdraw from the case. Since there is

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

no representation on behalf of the appellant, the appeal is accordingly

¶15

dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

(B.K. Bansal) Member

¶18

New Delhi, 23^rd March, 2017

¶19

‘A’

¶20

FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016

¶21

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016 of Rose Vally Marketing India Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1225/KOL/2016 of Rose Vally Marketing India Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases