Appellate Tribunal clarified that an interim order continues despite oversight and listed the matter for further proceedings requiring written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2389/MUM/2016 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1213/MUM/2016
Ravindara G. Sapkal … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri R.K Handoo, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
27.07.2017
MP-PMLA-2389/MUM/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1213/MUM/2016
Learned Counsel for the respondent Mr. Neeraj Atri seeks an adjournment. He submits that the respondent wishes to file the written synopsis. Both the parties have to file the written synopsis within four weeks.
List on 26th September, 2017.
We may mention that by Order dated 20th March, 2017 the interim order has been confirmed during the pendency of the appeal, but due to oversight in the order passed on 30th May, 2017, it has come that the same shall continue. It is clarified accordingly.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 27th July, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1213/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Ravindara G. Sapkal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
