The tribunal allowed time to file rejoinder, listed for argument on 4th May 2017, and required filing of written synopsis and documents before the next hearing date.
Time granted to file rejoinder; matter listed for argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2379/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1208/JL/2016
Manpreet Singh @ Mani … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandher
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 27.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-1208/JL/2016
Reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent. The counsel for
the appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List for argument on 4th May, 2017.
Both the parties should also file the written synopsis along with
the compilation of the documents on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 27th January, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1208/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Manpreet Singh @ Mani
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandher
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
