Appellant seeks time to file reply. Court allows six-week extension for reply submission and lists matter for 17th April, 2017. No dispositional order recorded.
Appearing before the Appellate Tribunal, the court noted the respondent's reply, recorded it, and granted the appellant an extension of time to file their reply within six weeks. The matter was listed for further hearing on 17th April, 2017, without a final disposition in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1181/COCHIN/2016 Riyas K.P. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Jaiman Andrews, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 11.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-1181/COCHIN/2016
The reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent. The same is taken on record. Let the rejoinder be filed. The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within six weeks.
List on 17th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 11th January, 2017.
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1181/COCHIN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Riyas K.P.
The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
