The Appellate Tribunal noted the non-filing of a reply by the respondent. It recorded that no new facts were raised and directed the matter to be listed for argument on 24th April, 2017.
Case listed for argument on 24th April, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1172/HYD/2016
M/s Gem Cables & Conductors Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Virender Ganda, Sr. Advocate Shri Tarun Mehta, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 27.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-1172/HYD/2016
The reply has not been filed. The counsel for the respondent states that no new facts are raised by the appellant and therefore no reply is necessary. He will argue the matter on the basis of existing pleadings or documents already on record.
List for argument on 24th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 27th January, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1172/HYD/2016
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a reply to the appellant's memorandum is required when no new facts are raised.
Whether the matter should be listed for argument after the respondent decides not to file a reply.
M/s Gem Cables & Conductors Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
