The Tribunal adjourned the appeal and the respondent's fresh application for producing documents to 6th February 2017. Arguments on merit are to commence subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3148/DLI/2016 (Mics) MP-PMLA-2335/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1168/DLI/2015
National Spot Exchange Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Director, … Respondent Financial Intelligent Unit-India, New Delhi
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. R. K. Handoo, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Sh. Satish Aggrawala, Advocate Ms. Neeru, Consultant (Legal) |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
02.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1168/DLI/2015
The appeal is at the stage of final argument. Earlier, it was adjourned for time to time at the request of the learned counsel for the respondent. It appears from the record that the fresh application filed by the respondent for taking the various documents on record. The prayer of the application is strongly opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant who submits that the application is no maintainable and he will make his submission with that regard when the appeal will be argued by him on merit. The appeal has been argued partly list for remaining argument on 6th February, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1168/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 2
List on 6th February, 2017.
The fresh application of the respondent also be listed on that date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava)
Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 2nd February, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1168/DLI/2015
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the fresh application filed by the respondent for producing documents is maintainable while the appeal is pending final argument.
National Spot Exchange Ltd.
The Director, Financial Intelligent Unit-India, New Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
