FPA-PMLA-1132/JL/2015 of Jagdish Singh Alias Bhola v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Jagdish Singh Alias Bhola V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2236/JL/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1132/JL/2015
Jagdish Singh Alias Bhola … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER [ ORDER 13.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1132/JL/2015
Reply has been filed by the respondent. Mr. Saud, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the copy has been E-mailed to the learned Counsel of the appellant. The rejoinder be filed by the appellant within four weeks. Both parties are also granted six weeks time to file written arguments. Mr. Saud states that instead of filing of written arguments, his client will file the copy of the prosecution complaint which contains all the details. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the appellant who is granted six weeks time to file written synopsis.
List on 31st October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jagdish Singh Alias Bhola
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1132/JL/2015
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court