FPA-PMLA-1129/JL/2015 of Amarjit Kaur v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Case brief
What is this about?
A debut order in appeal FPA-PMLA-1129/JL/2015 directing the respondent to furnish a reply copy and scheduling final argument.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2233/JL/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1129/JL/2015 Amarjit Kaur … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate on behalf of Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 22.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1129/JL/2015
Reply has been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the appellant states that copy of the same has not been received. He has informed us that counsel for the respondent has promised to send the copy by e-mail. Let the same be done within two weeks. The counsel for the appellant states that rejoinder if any be filed within four weeks. Both the parties will file the written synopsis. The respondent will file two extra copies of the reply in the registry who will place the copies of the reply in both the files.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amarjit Kaur
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · February
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1129/JL/2015
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court