Appellate Tribunal restored an appeal to the original position and listed for hearing. Bench also noted appellant's counsel withdrawal of vakalatnama.
The appeal is restored in the original position.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3430/KOL/2017 (Restoration) in MP-PMLA-2176/KOL/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1094/KOL/2015
Rose Valley Marketing India Ltd. … Appellants Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : Shri Samiron Borkatary, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI B.K. BANSAL |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
| ORDER 25.05.2017 |
MP-PMLA-3430/KOL/2017 (Restoration)
Fresh application has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Issue notice to the respondent. Sh. Vikas Garg, Learned Counsel for the respondent accepts notice. We heard the application for sometime for the reasons stated in the application. The prayer is allowed. The appeal is restored in the original position.
FPA-PMLA-1094/KOL/2015
The Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that he is not getting instructions from the appellant to argue the appeal. He is moving the application within one week to withdraw his vakalatnama so that appropriate orders in the main appeal may be passed.
FPA-PMLA-1094/KOL/2015 Page 1 of 2
List this appeal on 30th May, 2017 at 2.30 P.M.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
25th May, 2017
‘m’
FPA-PMLA-1094/KOL/2015 Page 2 of 2
Rose Valley Marketing India Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
B. K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
