Proceedings were adjourned because the counsel for the appellant was unavailable. This order contains no substantive decision.
This order is an administrative listing due to the unavailability of counsel for the appellant. No legal proposition was laid down and the matter was not disposed of on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3512/KOL/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-2170/KOL/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1092/KOL/2015 Rose Valley Project Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Mudit Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: | CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 23.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1092/KOL/2015
Arguing counsel for the appellant is not available, at request list on
06th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 23rd August, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1092/KOL/2015
Page 1 of 1
Rose Valley Project Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
