Application for adjournment of appeal allowed. Case listed for future hearing.
Application for adjournment allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1019/PTN/2015 Prakash Roy … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna & Others … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 12.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1019/PTN/2015
It is seen from the record that an application for adjournment has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant seeking adjournment of the appeal on the ground stated therein. There is no objection from the side of the respondent to the prayer of the appellant. Considered the prayer and allowed.
List on 13th July, 2017.
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 12th April, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1019/PTN/2015
Page 1 of 1
Prakash Roy
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
