The Appellate Tribunal listed an appeal/proceeding and noted the respondent's opposing submissions and the appellant's adjournment request without speaking further.
The Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, listed a matter, recorded that the respondent intends to file a complaint, and noted the appellant sought an adjournment; the order contains no operative directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1013/KOL/2015
M/s. Eve Industries … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants : | None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : |
CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL : |
MEMBER |
| ORDER 04.05.201 |
7 |
FPA-PMLA-1013/KOL/2015
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that admittedly charge sheet has been filed and the respondent intends to file the complaint under section 3 of PMLA. Even otherwise an adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant.
List on 15th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 4th May, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1013/KOL/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Eve Industries
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
