Partly allowed

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Construction Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP29 Mar 2017FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal granted a three-week extension for producing Section 50 statements and documentation. It set aside ex-parte proceedings against an inadvertently disqualified admitted person pending the filing of a Vakalatnama.

What did the court decide?

Allowed three weeks time for producing Section 50 statements and documents. Set aside ex-parte proceedings against Nitesh J. Thakur subject to filing Vakalatnama.

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Construction Pvt. Ltd… — Company and Corporate | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3041/MUM/2016(Misc) MP-PMLA-2057/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015

¶3

ACE Card Construction Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant

¶4

Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant	:	Shri Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate Shri Ankur Singh, Advocate Shri Arjun Krishnan, Advocate Shri Gauri Puri, Advocate
For the respondent	:	Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
Respondents for Nitesh J. Thakur	: : :	Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rahul Narayan, Mr. Shashwat Goel, Mr. Ajit Sanjyoti Redkar, Mr. Rohan Tamhane & Ms. Sanjyoti Redkar, Advocates
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	:	CHAIRMAN
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	:	MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	:	MEMBER

¶7

ORDER

¶8

29.03.2017

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015

¶10

Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate seeks three weeks time to produce the

¶11

copy of the statements recorded under Section- 50 in relation to Samata Nagar Property and relied upon document of all requisite O.Cs. The learned counsel for the appellant has no objection.

¶12

Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Advocate appears on behalf of the Shri Nitesh J. Thakur, who has already been proceeded ex-parte. The appellant in all the matters and respondent have no objection if the order of ex-parte proceeding against the Nitesh J. Thakur is withdrawn subject to the condition that proper Vakalatnama in accordance with the law be filed by

¶13

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Nitesh J. Thakur. Let the Vakalatname be filed on or before the next date of hearing with the latest address of Nitesh J. Thakur. Subject to file the Vakalatnama, the exparte proceedings against Nitesh J. Thakur are set-asides.

¶16

List on 02^nd May, 2017 at 2:30 PM.

¶17

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶18

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶19

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶20

New Delhi, 29^th March, 2017.

¶21

‘K’

¶22

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015

¶23

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Construction Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1008/MUM/2015 of Ace Card Construction Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases