In FPA-PMLA-1006/MUM/2015, the Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, New Delhi, noted service by publication and proceeded ex parte against respondent Nos. 2 to 5 who did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3039/MUM/2016 (Misc) MP-PMLA-2055/MUM/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1006/MUM/2015
ACE Card Power Pvt. Ltd
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate Shri Arjun Krishnan, Advocate For the respondent-1 : Shr S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
14.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-1006/MUM/2015
Respondent No. 2 to 5 have been served by way of publication. No
one appear on their behalf. They are proceeded ex-parte.
List for argument on 15th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 14th February, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1006/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent Nos. 2 to 5 proceeded ex parte due to lack of appearance in FPA-PMLA-1006/MUM/2015.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ACE Card Power Pvt. Ltd
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
