The Pune bench of the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act listed a pending application for hearing. No substantive arguments were finalised as submissions by the respondent-avatar were delayed, leading to an adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3037/MUM/2016 (Misc) MP-PMLA-2053/MUM/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1004/MUM/2015
Dhan Share Trading Pvt. Ltd
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajshekhar, Sh. Gauri Puri, Arjun Krishnan & Ankur Singh, Advocates
For the respondent-1 : Shri S.A Saud, Advocate For the respondent-2 : Shri Shashwat Goel, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA SHRI ANAND KISHORE
: CHAIRMAN
: MEMBER : MEMBER
ORDER 15.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1004/MUM/2015
The learned counsels for all the parties on behalf of the appellants have made their submissions. Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent-1 seeks some time to make his submissions and to file the written synopsis.
Mr. Shashwat Goel, Advocate submits that he is appearing on behalf of Shri Nitesh J. Thakur, Respondent-2. He doesn’t have the vakalatnama, he has not filed the same. He is also not prepared to give the address of Mr. Nitesh J. Thakur.
List on 20th March, 2017 at 2:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 15th March, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1004/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
Dhan Share Trading Pvt. Ltd
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
