The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property allowed an appellant's request to re-notify a specific date, based on the counsel's application.
Request to re-notify on 4th July, 2017 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-83/CHN/2017
Pasupuleti Shiva @ Paurmani Shiva Reddy … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sikandar Azam Khan, Advocate For the respondent : None. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 10.04.2017
FPA-ND-83/CHN/2017
At the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, re-notify on
4th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 10th April, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-ND-83/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Pasupuleti Shiva @ Paurmani Shiva Reddy
The Competent Authority, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
