Appellate Tribunal granted liberty to the respondent-appellant to rely on additional documents filed in a forfeiture proceedings matter pending before it.
Liberty granted to respondent to raise objections in reply based on additional documents; time fixed for reply and rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-173/DLI/2016 (Misc.) MP-ND-163/DLI/2016 (Stay)
&
FPA-ND-81/DLI/2016
Gurjeet Singh … Appellants/Applicants Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Shri Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri D.S. Bisth, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 16.02.2017
MP-ND-163/DLI/2016 (Stay) & FPA-ND-81/DLI/2016
Issue notice to the respondent. Shri D.S. Bisth, Advocate appear on behalf of the respondent accepts notice and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 11th May, 2017.
The learned counsel for the respondent stated that certain additional documents are filed which were not before the Competent
FPA-ND-81/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
Authority. Liberty is granted to the respondent to raise their objections in the reply and the same will be considered after examining the record.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 16th February, 2017
‘s’
FPA-ND-81/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
Gurjeet Singh
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
