Order of the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property allowing time to file a reply to a notice and listing the matter for further hearing. No disposition reached.
Time extended for respondent to file reply within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-ND-172/DLI/2016 (Misc.) MP-ND-162/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-ND-80/DLI/2016
Kabul Singh … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 11.05.2017
FPA-ND-80/DLI/2016
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. Mr. D.S. Bisht, Joint Director appears on behalf of the respondent and submits that reply is ready and he would file the same within one week.
Let the same be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 30th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 11th May, 2017
‘s’
FPA-80/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Kabul Singh
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
