This order recorded that the appellant did not file a rejoinder, closed the right to do so, listed parties to file written submissions, and fixed the next hearing for November 2017. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-148/DLI/2016 (Stay) MP-ND-149/DLI/2016 (COD) FPA-ND-66/DLI/2016
Mohd. Akhtar @ Raja
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri S.K. Santhoshi, Advocate For the respondent : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner
| CORAM | |
|---|---|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 27.07.2017
FPA-ND-66/DLI/2016
Rejoinder has not been filed by the appellant. Right to file the rejoinder is closed. Written submissions be filed by both the parties on or before the next date of hearing.
List the matter on 16th November, 2017
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 27th July, 2017
M
FPA-ND-66/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Mohd. Akhtar @ Raja
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
