This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-57/BOM/2008
Prashant Bhargav … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Pushkar Sood, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Ratnesh Srivastava, I.O |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.01.2017
FPA-ND-57/BOM/2008
The cost has been deposited by the appellant. Both the parties desire to file the written synopsis along with the compilation of the documents. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 11th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 23rd January, 2017. ‘K’ FPA-ND-57/BOM/2008
Page 1 of 1
Prashant Bhargav
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
