A one-paragraph procedural order extending time for filing a rejoinder in fixed property application FPA-ND-24/BOM/2014. No substantive legal decision was rendered.
Permission granted to file rejoinder within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP -ND-107/BOM/2014(Stay)
&
FPA-ND-24/BOM/2014
Mansukh Chaganlal Bhatt … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Shekhar Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Ratnessh Srivastava, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
10.04.2017
FPA-ND-24/BOM/2014
Reply has been filed by the counsel for the respondent. Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Advocate proxy counsel for appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 7th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 10th April, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-ND-24/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Mansukh Chaganlal Bhatt
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
