The Appellate Tribunal disposed of the applicant's request to certify the banker's certificate under Section 126 of the Evidence Act, effectively dismissing the appeal.
Request for certification rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-ND-20/MUM/2012 (Stay) FPA-ND-15/MUM/2011
M/s Maganlal Chaturbhai & Co. … Appellant Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Madhavi Khare, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Siddhartha Mazumdar, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 19.09.2017
FPA-ND-15/MUM/2011
At the request of the appellant, list on 22nd March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
19th September 2017
‘s’
FPA-ND-15/MUM/2011
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether production of accounts by bankers is required to be certified.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Maganlal Chaturbhai & Co.
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
