FPA-ND-14/BOM/2011 of M/s T.M. Shroff v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property recorded that the cost in the appeal was unpaid. The Tribunal listed the matter for the next hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-19/BOM/2012 (Stay) &
FPA-ND-14/BOM/2011
M/s T.M. Shroff … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Madhavi Khare, Advocate For the respondent : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner on behalf of Competent Authority, Mumbai CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.01.2017
MP-ND-19/BOM/2012(Stay) & FPA-ND-14/BOM/2011
The learned counsel for the appellant states that cost so far has not been paid. The counsel is carrying the cost. Mr. Bisht, appears on behalf of the respondent and seeks an adjournment. Even the request for the adjournment has been filed. Let the cost be paid by the appellant within four weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s T.M. Shroff
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
MANMOHAN SINGH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court