The Appellate Tribunal adjourned the appeal, directing the appellant to deposit the specified amounts within 30 days or face dismissal on the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-72/DLI/2010
M/s. Silicon Graphics Systems (P) Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Advocate, |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Pankaj Yadav, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 04.12.2017
FPA-FE-72/DLI/2010
Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the Hon’ble High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant on dated 29th November, 2017 which was filed against the order dated 18th November, 2015 whereby Tribunal directed to the appellant to deposit the 10 per cent of the amount of penalty imposed and reliable security for 50 per cent of the total amount of the penalty imposed. The said amount was not deposited.
Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment taking the instructions from his client. We direct the appellant to deposit the said amount as per the directions issued earlier within a period of 30 days; otherwise, the present appeal is likely to be dismissed on the next date of hearing.
List on 22nd January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 04th December, 2017 ‘AS’ FPA-FE-72/DLI/2010
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Silicon Graphics Systems (P) Ltd.
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
