The Foreign Exchange Management (Appellate Tribunal) Appeal was adjourned sine die to await the decision of a concurrent writ petition filed by the appellant in the High Court, with liberty to revive the appeal thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT
AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-507/MUM/2005
Shri Prashant Kumar
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Aarzoo Khanna, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Prashant Kumar Pandey, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 10.08.2017
FPA-FE-507/MUM/2005
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed the status report of Crl application no. 371/2011, Crl. M.A. No. 3381/2011 (Stay) and pointed out the order dated 10th July, 2017 whereby the said appeal has been admitted and listed in the category of regular matter and the interim order which was passed on 21st March, 2011 has been confirmed.
List this matter on 9th January, 2018.
Under these circumstances, appeal is sine die adjourned. As and when the writ petition filed by the appellant is decided by the High Court, the parties are granted liberty to approach for revival of the appeal if so required.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 10th August, 2017
‘d’
FPA-FE-507/MUM/2005
Page 1 of 1
Shri Prashant Kumar
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
