Appeal listed adjourned due to appellant counsel's unavailability with mutual agreement of both sides..
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-40/MUM/2014
Shri B.K. Goenka … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Akshat Gupta, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Shri Udit Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Pankaj Yadav, Legal Consultant CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 28.08.2017
FPA-FE-40/MUM/2014
As per the provisions of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act 2017, the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (ATFE) has been merged with the Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers & Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Properties) Act 1976, w. e. f. 26.05.2017. The file in the above said matter has been received by this Tribunal on 1st July, 2017.
The arguing counsel for the appellant is not available and request for an adjournment which is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent.
List on 7th March, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 28th August, 2017. ‘d’
FPA-FE-40/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
B.K. Goenka
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
