Disposed

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009 of Sh. S. Jagadeesar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP12 Jul 2017FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal listed a pending appeal against non-appearance of the appellant. The registry directed the issuance of notice to the appellant for the next hearing, with a warning that the appeal would likely be dismissed if the appellant failed to appear or comply with the preliminary compliance order.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009 of Sh. S. Jagadeesar v/s The Joint… — Banking and Recovery | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009

¶3

Sh. S. Jagadeesar … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant	: None
For the respondent	: Shri Prashant Pandey, Advocate Ms. Aagam Kaur, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶6

ORDER 12.07.2017

¶7

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009

¶8

As per the provision of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act 2017, the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (ATFE) has been merged with the Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers & Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Properties) Act 1976, w. e. f. 26.05.2017. The file in the above said matter has been received by this Tribunal on 1^st July, 2017.

¶9

When the matter is taken up today, no one appears on behalf of the appellant. It appears form the order dated 1^st August, 2016 that the Hon’ble Madras High Court had directed the appellant to deposit 15% of the penalty amount of Rs. 1 crors i.e. 15 lakhs within the period of 30 days from the date of communication of the order.

¶10

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the said order

¶11

has not been complied by the appellant.

¶12

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

Since no one appears on behalf of the appellant, the registry will issue the notice to the appellant as well as his counsel for representing the case on the next date of hearing. In case the appellant has not complied with the order and does not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal is likely to be dismissed.

¶15

List on 13^th November, 2017 at 2:30 pm.

¶16

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶17

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶18

New Delhi, 12^th July, 2017.

¶19

‘s’

¶20

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009

¶21

Page 2 of 2

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009 of Sh. S. Jagadeesar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-FE-151/MUM/2009 of Sh. S. Jagadeesar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases