FPA-FE-15/MUM/2016 of Union of India v/s Ms. Susan Joyce Cotto
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment sought on behalf of respondent; matter listed for future date; order contains no substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-15/MUM/2016
Union of India … Appellant Versus Ms. Susan Joyce Cotto … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mrs. Agam Kaur, Legal Consultant For the respondent : Shri Mukesh Jaisingh, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER [ ORDER 23.08.2017
FPA-FE-15/MUM/2016
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the respondent’s counsel.
List on 21st February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 23rd August, 2017 ‘A’ FPA-FE-15/MUM/2016 Page 1 of 1
Union of India
Ms. Susan Joyce Cotto
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court