FPA-3/DLI/2013 of Sriprasad Singh v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
This order adjourns the appellant pending availability of counsel. No substantive decision or legal proposition is recorded in this text. It is a procedural step in an appeal regarding forfeited property.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-50/DLI/2013 (COD) MP-15/DLI/2014 (MICS) FPA-3/DLI/2013
Sriprasad Singh … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Avinash Kumar, Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Munesh Chauhan, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 28.04.2017
FPA-3/DLI/2013
The arguing counsel on behalf of the appellant is not available. The request is made on behalf of the appellant for adjournment which is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent.
List on 7th July, 2017.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sriprasad Singh
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court