The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property heard an application regarding Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976. The order only contains a direction to re-notify the matter on 27th March, 2017 without substantive reasoning or decision on the merits.
The matter is directed to be re-notified on 27th March, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
FPA-6/BOM/2014
Chetan Ajit Satam … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Nilakente, Advocate for Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 23.01.2017
FPA-6/BOM/2014
Re-notify the matter on 27th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
23rd January, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-6/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chetan Ajit Satam
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
