FPA-66/DLI/2002 of Praveen Makharia v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive disposition. The court listed the appeal for further arguments and granted the respondent additional time to file written synopses.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-66/DLI/2002 Praveen Makharia … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Kawaljit Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Anil Tripathi, Advocate, with Shri D.S. Bisth, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 09.03.2017
FPA-66/DLI/2002
Written synopses have not been filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent seeks some more time to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List the appeal for remaining arguments on 11th May, 2017.
Mr. D.S. Bisth, Joint Commissioner appeared on behalf of the respondent and submits that his client intends to move an application for returning the original file of the department.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Praveen Makharia
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court