The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property directed the Competent Authority to re-notify the matter on 28 April 2017 in light of a previous order.
Direction to re-notify the matter on 28 April 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
FPA-65/MUM/2017
Mr. Chetan Vora … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Kiran Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
27.03.2017
FPA-65/MUM/2017
In view of the order passed in FPA-21/MUM/2014, re-notify the matter on 28th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 27th March, 2017
‘d’
FPA-65/MUM/2017
Page of 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matter needs to be re-notified by the Competent Authority for further proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chetan Vora
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
