Interim list order scheduling argument within the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property. The Tribunal granted the respondent four weeks to file a compilation of documents.
Respondent granted four weeks to file compilation of documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-65/DLI/2002
Som Pirani
… Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Kawaljit Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Anil Tripathi, Advocate & Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
01.02.2017
FPA-65/DLI/2002
The compilation of documents has been filed by the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks some time to file the compilation of the documents which supports the case of the respondent within four weeks from today.
List for argument on 09th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 01st February, 2017
‘A’
FPA-65/DLI/2002 Page 1 of 1
Som Pirani
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri G.C. Mishra
Shri B.K. Bansal
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
