The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property listed the appeal FPA-63/DLI/2002 for further arguments. The respondent filed a synopsis and sought time, with the Tribunal ordering the return of the department file and listing the matter for subsequent hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-63/DLI/2002 Paramjit Singh … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Kawaljit Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Anil Tripathi, Advocate, with Shri D.S. Bisth, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 09.03.2017
FPA-63/DLI/2002
Written synopses have not been filed by the respondent. Counsel for
the respondent seeks some more time to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List the appeal for remaining arguments on 11th May, 2017.
Mr. D.S. Bisth, Joint Commissioner appeared on behalf of the
respondent and submits that his client intends to move an application for returning the original file of the department.
FPA-63/DLI/2002
Page 1 of 2
Let the proper application be filed, as when the same is filed then
proper order would be passed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
9th March, 2017.
‘s’
FPA-63/DLI/2002
Page 2 of 2
Paramjit Singh
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
